Aeon Nimbus
Aeon Nimbus Research
Markets NYSE · LSE · Tokyo · Frankfurt

LiJieGuo.

Independent Macro & Equity Research · London
5 for 5. Every investment call published with full thesis, entry, stop-loss, and position size before the outcome is known — and closed profitable. Average return per closed call: +42.0% · Hit rate: 100% · All five permanently on the record.
Education
Triple MSc — emlyon · Politecnico di Milano · Bayes (Cass)
Designation
CFA Level I Candidate
Experience
L/S Equity · Quant Research · Macro Strategy
Track Record
100% hit rate · 5 closed calls · All pre-published
100%

Hit rate across all closed calls.
Each position published with complete thesis and sizing before market close. The record is permanent and unedited.

# Instrument Thesis vs. Street Published Period Return
01
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
Buy · Missed $98B backlog
8 Apr 2026
Apr – Jun 2026
+74.3%
02
IREN
IREN Limited
Uncovered · Macro fear mispriced
20 May 2026
May – Jun 2026
+36.4%
03
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
Loss ratio cracked below 70% — reinsurance treaty reset cleared the structural overhang on a business priced for failure.
Street Sell · Missed loss-ratio turn
2 Jul 2026
Jul 2026
+34.7%
04
RDDT
Reddit, Inc.
Street Mixed · Missed AI data angle
27 May 2026
May – Jun 2026
+32.5%
05
MRVL
Marvell Technology
Custom silicon cycle severely underpriced — hyperscaler ASIC commitments locked in multi-year revenue that consensus hadn't modeled.
Street Buy · Missed ASIC cycle
9 Jun 2026
Jun 2026
+31.9%
Avg. return +42.0% · Hit rate 100% · 5 closed positions · All published pre-outcome
+0%
Avg. Return · Closed Calls
+0%
Model Fund Return · Inception
0
Systematic Strategies · Active
0
Sharpe Ratio · Model Portfolio
Portfolio Simulation · Closed Calls
Cumulative P&L:
Portfolio AUM
$
Allocation per call (%)
Capital Deployed
Total Gain
Final Portfolio
Return on AUM
Avg per Call
Investment Philosophy

The market misprices
divergence.

Every position begins with a single question: what does the market believe, and why is that belief wrong? The answer is rarely about sectors. It is about the gap between narrative and fundamental reality — the moment when consensus pricing embeds a story that the underlying business, macro backdrop, or structural dynamic no longer supports.

The approach is bottom-up in execution and top-down in framing. A company's unit economics, balance sheet inflection, or competitive moat matters most — but it matters when the macro backdrop creates the catalyst that makes the market look. Patience to wait for that convergence, discipline to size asymmetrically, and the willingness to publish the full thesis before the outcome is known — that is the practice.

01 — EDGE
Narrative vs. Reality
Markets price stories. When the story diverges from what the numbers actually show — on unit economics, competitive position, or structural change — the gap is the opportunity. Sector is irrelevant. The divergence is not.
02 — CONSTRUCTION
Asymmetric Risk · Defined Loss
Every call enters with a defined stop. The maximum loss is known before the position is opened; the upside is uncapped and thesis-driven. Sizing is disciplined — enough to matter, never enough to compromise the portfolio if the thesis is wrong.
03 — PROCESS
Catalyst-Driven Timing
Being right too early is the same as being wrong. Each thesis requires a specific near-term catalyst — an earnings inflection, a regulatory event, a macro regime shift — that forces the market to reprice. The catalyst defines the horizon; the fundamental gap defines the magnitude.
04 — ACCOUNTABILITY
Published Before the Outcome
Full thesis, entry price, stop-loss, and position size go public before the position plays out. Nothing is revised retrospectively. The record — wins and future losses alike — stays permanently public. Accountability is the only honest framework for trust.
Investment Thesis

Sell-side models are built for stable-state businesses. Most of the time, that is fine. The problems appear at inflection points — when a company's underlying economics change in a way that makes the consensus model not just imprecise, but wrong from first principles.

These inflections are identifiable. A loss ratio crosses a structural threshold and changes the economics of reinsurance. A cloud backlog reaches a scale that transforms a revenue model from linear to compounding. A proprietary asset the market prices as a commodity turns out to be irreplaceable infrastructure. In each case, the sell-side — anchored to trailing comparables — lags the change. The price lags the sell-side. That sequence is the opportunity.

Every position on this record was built on the same question: not "is this a good company?" but "has something in this business just changed that the consensus model hasn't updated for?" That is a narrower question, and a harder one. It requires reading the financials in the right order — balance sheet before income statement, unit economics before the multiple, the direction of the key variable before the aggregate — at the moment that order matters most.

Oracle, IREN, Lemonade, Reddit, Marvell — five different sectors, five different geographies, five different market caps. The common thread is a specific structural change at the business level that consensus pricing had not yet reflected. This mispricing is not random. It repeats, because sell-side incentives reward coverage breadth over depth, and models built for breadth miss inflections by design.

The thesis is not sector-specific, factor-specific, or geography-specific. It is specifically an inflection thesis: the argument that sell-side models systematically underprice businesses that have just crossed a threshold, because those models were not built to handle the discontinuity.

Research. Systems. Tools.

Three parts of one independent research practice — all free, all public, all permanently on the record.

Research Lab

12 Systematic Strategies

A live macro model portfolio built on 12 fully systematic strategies across equity and FX — each backtested to 99% real-tick data. Free access, no paywall, no login.

EQ MomentumFX Trend Macro RegimeVol Targeting Mean ReversionFactor Alpha EM RotationRate Sensitivity L/S EquityCarry Momentum×VolTail Risk
Research

Pre-Outcome Investment Calls

Every formal call published before the outcome — full thesis, entry, stop, and sizing. Losses included. Nothing deleted.

Jupiter Asset Management
Equity · Initiating · Jul 2026
Open
Dollar Squeeze — EM Positioning
Macro · Brief · Jun 2026
Oracle Corporation
Equity · Closed · Mar 2026
+74.3%
Tools

Six Analyst Tools — Free

Practitioner-grade financial tools built in the browser. No login, no limits, no paywall. Used by analysts in 40+ countries.

DCF(FCF, r, g)
DCF Valuation Engine
BSM(S, K, σ, T, r)
Black-Scholes Calculator
N(μ, σ²) × 10⁴
Monte Carlo Simulator
f* = (bp − q) / b
Kelly Criterion Sizer
Coverage Universe

Sectors & Themes Under Active Coverage

Technology
AI Infrastructure
Semiconductors
Cloud & SaaS
Custom Silicon
Data Centres
Cybersecurity
Financials
Insurtech
Digital Banking
Capital Markets
Alt. Asset Mgmt
Credit
Fintech
Consumer & Media
Social Platforms
Digital Media
E-Commerce
Consumer Tech
Gaming
Marketplaces
Energy & Infra
Digital Mining
Power & Utilities
Energy Transition
Data Infra
Storage
Grid Tech
Global Macro
Central Bank Policy
FX & Rates
EM Markets
Geopolitics
Credit Cycles
Commodities
Systematic
EQ Momentum
FX Trend
Macro Regime
Mean Reversion
Vol Targeting
Carry & Factor
Research delivered to your inbox.

Macro briefs, equity deep dives, geopolitical reads — each with a formal investment call published before the outcome is known. Every result on the record.

Subscribe on Substack →
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
Featured Research

Recent Investment Calls & Macro Briefs

All Research ↗

Verified Investment Track Record

Every investment call published by Aeon Nimbus Research is timestamped on Substack before the position plays out. Returns are calculated from the published entry price to exit. The record below represents all closed calls as of July 2026.

TickerCompanyEntryExitReturnPeriodPublished
ORCLOracle Corporation$143.36$249.88+74.3%Apr – Jun 20268 Apr 2026
IRENIREN Limited$47.88$65.30+36.4%May – Jun 202620 May 2026
LMNDLemonade Inc.$59.56$80.23+34.7%Jul 20262 Jul 2026
RDDTReddit Inc.$140.88$186.68+32.5%May – Jun 202627 May 2026
MRVLMarvell Technology$245.05$323.26+31.9%Jun 20269 Jun 2026

5 closed calls · 100% hit rate · +42.0% average return · All calls published before outcome on Substack · All positions including future losses remain permanently on record.

Who Is LiJie Guo?

LiJie Guo is a macro and equity research analyst based in London. He holds a Triple MSc — MSc in Management (Finance Track) from emlyon Business School, MSc in Quantitative Finance from Politecnico di Milano, and MSc in Finance (Asset Management) from Bayes Business School (formerly Cass) — and is a CFA Level I candidate. His professional career spans multiple institutions across three countries, covering long/short equity, quantitative research, macro strategy, private equity, private credit, and Big Four financial advisory.

Professional Experience

  • Jupiter Asset Management — investment research and analysis
  • Crandon Capital Management (Crandon AM) — quantitative research, private credit, and real estate investment analysis
  • Santomera Bay Capital (Santomera Bay) — macro strategy and private equity portfolio management at a leading independent fund platform in Spain
  • PwC — Big Four M&A financial due diligence and transaction advisory
  • SpinLab — HHL Accelerator — early-stage venture capital exposure in European tech ecosystem
  • Antler — the world's most active early-stage VC, Berlin operations

Academic Credentials

  • MSc in Management (Finance Track) — emlyon Business School
  • MSc in Quantitative Finance — Politecnico di Milano
  • MSc in Finance, Asset Management — Bayes Business School (formerly Cass), City University of London
  • CFA Level I Candidate (Chartered Financial Analyst program)

What Is Aeon Nimbus Research?

Aeon Nimbus Research is an independent macro and equity research platform founded by LiJie Guo in London. It is not a hedge fund, not a registered investment adviser, and does not manage external capital. It is a research publication platform with a rigorous, verifiable methodology.

The defining feature of Aeon Nimbus Research is its pre-outcome commitment framework: every formal investment call is published in full — entry price, stop-loss level, position size as a percentage of portfolio, target price, investment horizon, and complete fundamental or macro thesis — before the trade plays out. This makes the track record tamper-proof. Nothing is revised, deleted, or selected after the fact.

The platform publishes research across four domains: single-stock equity analysis, global macro, geopolitical market dynamics, and systematic quantitative strategies.

  • Equity Research — formal investment calls on US and international equities, with full thesis published before outcome
  • Global Macro — central bank policy analysis, monetary regime forecasting, inflation dynamics, and interest rate impact on markets
  • Geopolitical Market Analysis — how political events and power shifts translate into market dislocations
  • Systematic Strategies — 12 proprietary quantitative models across 7 equity and 5 FX/commodity strategies, backtested on real tick data across 12+ years of full market cycles

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LiJie Guo's research free?

Yes. All research published by Aeon Nimbus Research is available free on Substack at aeonnimbus.substack.com. There is no paywall, no subscription fee, and no premium tier. Macro briefs, equity calls, geopolitical reads, central bank analysis, and systematic strategy commentary are all published at no cost.

How does Aeon Nimbus Research compare to other independent research platforms?

Most independent research platforms publish views after the fact, cherry-pick winning calls, or do not disclose entry and exit levels. Aeon Nimbus Research publishes every formal call before the outcome is known, with full parameters — entry, stop-loss, target, size, and thesis. This creates a verifiable, auditable record that cannot be retroactively edited.

What was the Oracle ORCL investment thesis?

Published 8 April 2026 at $143.36. The thesis: Oracle's $98 billion cloud backlog was invisible to Wall Street consensus. AI infrastructure demand had compressed Oracle's five-year cloud buildout into an 18-month window, creating a revenue inflection that consensus models had not captured. The position was closed at $249.88 on 1 June 2026, returning +74.3%.

What was the Reddit RDDT investment thesis?

Published 27 May 2026 at $140.88. The thesis: Reddit is AI's training feedstock, not its victim. Reddit's unique corpus of human-generated, context-rich text is the data infrastructure that every major AI lab depends on. The market was pricing Reddit as if AI would displace it — the opposite was true. Closed at $186.68 on 4 June 2026, returning +32.5%.

What is the Aeon Nimbus macro model portfolio?

The Aeon Nimbus macro model portfolio is a dynamic, regime-driven allocation framework. It adjusts weights across equities, fixed income, gold, commodities, and cash based on the prevailing macro regime — including inflation trajectory, central bank policy stance, credit cycle position, and geopolitical risk level. It has returned +28.4% since inception and is a research vehicle, not a live fund.

Who is the target audience for Aeon Nimbus Research?

Aeon Nimbus Research is designed for individual investors who want to see how a professional constructs and tracks investment theses with full transparency; finance students and CFA candidates studying fundamental equity analysis and macro research methodology; family offices and allocators evaluating independent research talent with a verified, pre-outcome track record; and quantitative researchers interested in systematic strategy construction across equity and FX markets.

Is there a Q2 2026 investor letter from Aeon Nimbus Research?

Yes. The Q2 2026 investor letter is available as a PDF download on aeonnimbus.com. It covers the closed positions from Q2 2026, the investment philosophy, methodology, and outlook for open positions.

Legal Disclaimer — Aeon Nimbus Research is an independent research and analysis platform operated by LiJie Guo, London, United Kingdom. All content published on this website and associated channels is for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing on this site constitutes investment advice, a solicitation, a recommendation, or an offer or invitation to buy or sell any financial instrument or security. Past performance, including any track record presented, is not indicative of future results. Investment decisions are solely the reader's own responsibility. LiJie Guo is not a regulated financial adviser and Aeon Nimbus Research is not a regulated investment firm. For enquiries: LinkedIn ↗
Independent Macro & Equity Research · London

LiJie Guo.

Spanish-born, ethnically Chinese. Based in London. Independent macro and equity research analyst — publishing every investment call before the outcome is known.

TripleMSc · 3 Schools
CFALevel I Candidate
4+Institutions · 3 Countries
12Systematic Strategies
£51bnAUM Research Scope
Investment Philosophy
"The world is always mispriced somewhere. Capital follows narratives. Narratives follow power. Most investors read the price. This is about reading what moves it."

Aeon Nimbus is an independent macro and equity research platform built on a single principle: every formal investment call is published with full thesis, entry, stop-loss, and position size before the outcome is known. No retrospective commentary. No curated track records. The research covers global macro, single-stock equity, geopolitical market dynamics, and central bank policy — combined with proprietary algorithmic strategies across 5 FX/commodity pairs and 7 systematic equity models.

Career Progression
Independent Fund Platform · Spain
Long/Short Equity & Macro

Portfolio research and trade execution across L/S equity and macro strategies at a leading independent fund platform in Spain.

Crandon
Private Credit & Real Estate

Credit analysis and real estate investment across private debt and direct property strategies.

Santomera Bay · Barcelona
Private Equity & Strategy

Portfolio management and Strategy & Operations at a private family office in Barcelona, covering direct PE positions and strategic advisory.

PwC
M&A Financial Due Diligence

Financial due diligence on M&A transactions, covering financial modelling, quality of earnings, and deal structuring analysis.

SpinLab (HHL) · Antler · Berlin
Venture & Early-Stage VC

Early exposure to Europe's venture ecosystem through the HHL Accelerator (SpinLab) and Antler, the world's most active early-stage VC, in Berlin.

Aeon Nimbus Research · London Current
Independent Macro & Equity Research

Publishing independent macro and equity research with a public, pre-outcome track record. 100% hit rate across 5 closed calls, avg +42.0% return. 12 systematic strategies. Open-source financial tools.

Education

He holds a Triple MSc — MSc in Management (Finance Track) from emlyon, MSc in Quantitative Finance from Politecnico di Milano, and MSc in Finance (Asset Management) from Bayes Business School (formerly Cass) — and is a CFA Level I candidate.

EM
emlyon Business School
MSc in Management · France
PM
Politecnico di Milano
MSc · GSOM · Italy
BS
Bayes Business School
MSc in Finance · City, University of London

Current Research

Jupiter Asset Management · London · FTSE 250
Equity Return Predictability Across Japanese, US & European Markets

An industry research project at Jupiter Asset Management (£51bn AUM) investigating cross-market equity return predictability using factor models and statistical tests. The project is jointly supervised by an Asset Pricing professor at Bayes Business School, a Systematic Equity Portfolio Manager at Jupiter AM, and a Computational Finance professor at Paris Dauphine University.

Economic framework
Hypothesis construction
Python · Factor models
Statistical tests

Availability

Open to research collaborations
Open to institutional enquiries
Considering full-time roles
Selective on advisory roles
Research Methodology

How I Build an Investment Thesis

01 · SCREENING
Macro-first, then single-stock

Every idea starts with a macro read: what is the prevailing regime, where is the central bank in its cycle, and which sectors benefit from or are exposed to the current geopolitical configuration. Only then do I screen for single stocks within that macro frame — avoiding sector bets that fight the regime.

02 · FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS
Identify what the street is missing

I look for one key variable the consensus has mispriced: a structural inflection that hasn't yet shown up in earnings, a balance sheet item the market is treating incorrectly, or a demand driver that sell-side models have not incorporated. Each call requires a specific, falsifiable thesis — not directional sentiment.

03 · POSITION CONSTRUCTION
Size, stop, and time horizon first

Before publishing, I set three parameters: position size as % of portfolio (typically 2–5%), a hard stop-loss at the level that would invalidate the thesis, and an investment horizon (not a price target timeline). Sizing is driven by conviction and correlation — I will not concentrate across correlated names.

04 · PRE-OUTCOME PUBLICATION
The record is written before the result

Every call is published on Substack and recorded on aeonnimbus.com with a timestamp before the market closes on the entry date. The full thesis, entry price, stop-loss, and size are all visible before the outcome is known. Nothing is retroactively edited or deleted — the record stands permanently regardless of result.

05 · SYSTEMATIC OVERLAY
Quantitative signals as a second opinion

Discretionary calls are stress-tested against the 12 systematic strategies running in parallel. If the quant models flatly contradict a discretionary thesis, I either reduce size or re-examine my fundamental assumptions. The systematic portfolio is not a replacement for fundamental thinking — it is a check on behavioural bias and timing.

06 · EXIT DISCIPLINE
Rules-based, not emotional

Positions are closed when: the stop-loss is triggered, the original thesis is invalidated by new data, a better risk-adjusted opportunity presents itself, or the position reaches a point where continued holding requires a new thesis rather than the original one. Hitting a price target is not automatically a close trigger — the thesis must be reassessed at every major inflection.

↓ Download Q2 Letter
Published research

Research Notes

Equity deep dives · Macro briefs · Geo/market wraps · Central bank analysis

Date Category Title Read
01
Subscribe Free
Every note lands in your inbox as published. No spam. Research is always free.
Subscribe on Substack →
02
Track Record
Every formal call published with entry, target, and full thesis. Wins and losses — all on the record.
View full record →
03
Interactive Tools
Black-Scholes, DCF, portfolio construction, and more — free, open-source, in-browser tools.
Open toolkit →
Audited performance

Track Record

Every call published publicly before the outcome is known. Losses included. Never deleted.

↓ Q2 2026 Investor Letter (PDF)
Total calls
0
— open
Hit rate
Closed positions only
Avg. return · closed
Realised P&L
Capital deployed
Open position sizing
Alpha vs. S&P 500
Since first call · S&P:
Live prices · S&P 500 from 08 Apr 2026 · methodology ↓
Closed Positions
Capital Simulation
cumulative realised P&L across closed calls, at recorded position sizing
Open Position Composition
Deployed
Sized by position weight · live ROI from the table above
Simulated for illustration, applying real published returns and position sizes to a hypothetical AUM — not a live fund, not investment advice.
Open Book · Live Prices
Realized
+
Unrealized
=
Total P&L
Weighted return · open
Full Record
DateTickerDirectionEntryTargetStopSizeHorizonStatusReturnLast PriceROI
Investor Letters
2026
Q2 2026 · Apr – Jun
Aeon Nimbus Investor Letter
Performance review · portfolio positioning · macro outlook
PDF ↓
Methodology & Disclosures

Methodology: Every call is published on Substack with entry price, stop-loss, position size, and full thesis — before the outcome is known. Returns are calculated from the published entry price to exit price. Open P&L uses live prices. S&P 500 benchmark starts from 08 Apr 2026, the date of the first call. All positions, including losses, remain on the record and are never edited or deleted.

⚠  A 100% hit rate carries a caveat: five trades closed, all closed early rather than run to full target or stop. The streak has not yet been tested by a realised loss. Treat this as a live, transparent starting point — not a mature track record.

Built & open-sourced by Aeon Nimbus

Open Source Tools

Six analyst tools — Black-Scholes to DCF to portfolio construction — built from scratch by Aeon Nimbus, open-sourced on GitHub, and free to use in the browser.

Quant
QM
Quantitative Models
Black-Scholes · Monte Carlo · Bond Analytics · Volatility Engine
Open Source · GitHub ↗
Open Tool
Core
VE
Complete Valuation Engine
DCF · WACC/CAPM · 3-way sensitivity · Peer comps · Football field · Reverse DCF
Open Source · GitHub ↗
Open Tool
PM Skill
PC
Portfolio Construction
Efficient frontier · Sharpe optimisation · Correlation matrix · Risk attribution
Open Source · GitHub ↗
Open Tool
PM Skill
PS
Position Sizing Calculator
Kelly criterion · Fixed fractional · Max drawdown simulation · R-multiple
Open Source · GitHub ↗
Open Tool
PM Skill
CA
Cross-Asset Correlation
Macro regime detection · Correlation heatmap · Risk-on / risk-off scoring
Open Source · GitHub ↗
Open Tool
Analyst Skill
IS
Investment Idea Screener
Catalyst scoring · Sentiment overlay · EV/EBITDA · FCF yield · Momentum rank
Open Source · GitHub ↗
Open Tool
QM
Quantitative Models Original
Aeon Nimbus · Black-Scholes · Monte Carlo · Bond Analytics · Volatility Engine
Quant⬡ GitHub
AEON NIMBUS · ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATIONS · ALL COMPUTATIONS IN-BROWSER · MATHEMATICALLY VERIFIED
Inputs
Spot Price S
Strike K
Time to Expiry T (yrs)
Volatility σ %
Risk-free Rate r %
Option Type
Results
Option Price
Delta Δ
∂V/∂S
Gamma Γ
∂²V/∂S²
Theta Θ
per calendar day
Vega ν
per 1% vol move
Rho ρ
per 1% rate move
Payoff Diagram — Intrinsic value & option premium vs spot at expiry
Implied Volatility — Newton-Raphson
Market Price
Implied Volatility
GBM Parameters
Spot Price S₀
Annual Drift μ %
Annual Vol σ %
Simulations
Horizon (days)
Simulated Paths — up to 200 displayed · S(t+dt) = S(t)·exp((μ−σ²/2)dt + σ√dt·Z)
Terminal Distribution Statistics
MetricValue
Mean terminal price
Std deviation
5th percentile
Median (50th pct)
95th percentile
P(profit) — above S₀
P(> +20%)
P(< −20%)
Bond Parameters
Face Value ($)
Coupon Rate %
Coupon Frequency
YTM %
Maturity (years)
Accrued days since last cpn
Results
Clean Price
% of face value
Dirty Price
Clean + accrued int.
Macaulay Duration
years
Modified Duration
% price chg / 1% YTM
Convexity
2nd-order rate sensitivity
DV01
$ per 1bp move in YTM
Price–Yield Curve · Tangent line at current YTM shows duration approximation
Cashflow Schedule
PeriodCashflowPV of CFWt (t×PV/P)Cumulative Wt
Parameters
Spot Price
Annualised Vol σ %
Annual Drift μ %
Horizon (days)
Target Price (P(hit))
Volatility Cone — GBM uncertainty bands over time
Terminal Distribution — Log-normal density
Expected Terminal
S₀·e^(μT)
Median Terminal
S₀·e^((μ-σ²/2)T)
P(hit target)
probability S_T ≥ target
1σ range at T
±1 std dev band
Implied Volatility Surface — 5×5 B-S IV heatmap (strike × expiry)
VE
Complete Valuation Engine
DCF · WACC/CAPM · 3-way sensitivity · Peer comps · Football field · Reverse DCF
Core⬡ GitHub
Company
Name
Ticker
Share price ($)
Shares out. (M)
Net debt ($M)
Market cap ($M)
Financials ($M)
Revenue TTM
EBITDA TTM
EBITDA margin %
D&A ($M)
CapEx ($M)
Tax rate %
Growth assumptions
Rev growth Y1 %
Rev growth Y2 %
Rev growth Y3 %
Rev growth Y4 %
EBITDA margin Y5 %
Terminal growth %
Exit EV/EBITDA (x)
CapEx % rev Y5
WACC / CAPM
Risk-free rate %
Equity risk prem %
Beta
Country risk prem %
Cost of debt %
Debt weight %
Risk-free rate (Rf)
US 10Y yield
β × Equity risk prem
Systematic risk component
Country risk premium
EM adjustment
Cost of equity (Ke)
CAPM result: Rf + β×ERP + CRP
Ke × equity weight
Equity contribution to WACC
Kd(AT) × debt weight
Debt contribution to WACC
Capital structure
Equity % / Debt %
WACC
Discount rate used in DCF
Metric ($M)Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5
Click Run Complete Valuation in the Inputs tab first.
PV of FCFs (Y1–Y5)
Discounted at WACC
Terminal value
Exit multiple × Y5 EBITDA
PV of terminal value
TV share of total EV
Enterprise value
PV FCFs + PV TV
Net debt (–)
Subtracted from EV
Equity value
EV minus net debt
Implied share price
Equity value ÷ shares
Upside / downside
vs current price
Run valuation to see reverse DCF analysis — what the current price implies the market is assuming.
Bear case (20%)
WACC +2%, terminal growth −1%
Base case (60%)
Your model assumptions
Bull case (20%)
WACC −1%, terminal growth +0.5%
Expected value (probability-weighted: Bear 20% / Base 60% / Bull 20%)

Each cell shows the implied share price under that WACC and terminal growth combination. Base case highlighted in gold. Green = material upside. Amber = near current. Red = downside.

Run valuation in Inputs tab to generate sensitivity tables.

CompanyEV/EBITDAEV/RevenueFCF YieldRev GrowthEBITDA MarginImplied Price
Run valuation first.
Peer median EV/EBITDA
→ implied price
Peer median EV/Revenue
→ implied price
Multi-method average
DCF + 2 peer methods
DCF vs peer convergence
Alignment check

The football field plots all valuation methods on a single axis. The red line is the current share price. The wider the range of methods above the red line, the more asymmetric the upside.

Run valuation first.

PC
Portfolio Construction
Build a mock fund · P&L attribution · Long/short exposure · Risk budget discipline
PM Skill⬡ GitHub

Build a mock portfolio to demonstrate portfolio-level thinking — the skill that separates analysts from PMs. Add positions below. The tool calculates total exposure, P&L, long/short split, and remaining risk capacity.

TickerEntry $Current $SharesDirP&L
Total market value
Total unrealised P&L
Portfolio return
Long / Short exposure
Add positions and calculate to see risk summary.
Calculate portfolio in the Builder tab first.
Total Capital ($)
Max Single Position %
Max Total Deployed %
TickerDirectionConv.Entry $Target $Stop $Alloc %
Portfolio Simulation Results
Total Capital
Capital Deployed
Remaining Cash
Positions
Expected Gain (target)
Max Loss (all stopped)
Expected Return %
Risk/Reward
Position Breakdown
Psychological & Risk Assessment
Run simulation to see psychological assessment.
PS
Position Sizing Calculator
Kelly Criterion · Fixed-risk (1R) · Conviction-weighted — the skill that separates analysts from PMs
PM Skill⬡ GitHub

How much capital you allocate to each idea is as important as the idea itself. This tool implements three methods used by professional PMs. Full Kelly maximises theoretical log-wealth; modified Kelly (½ or ¼) controls for estimation error. Fixed-risk anchors size to your stop-loss distance. Conviction-weighted blends both.

Kelly Criterion
f* = (p·b − (1−p)) / b
where p = win probability, b = win/loss ratio
Win probability (p)
Win/loss ratio (b)
Portfolio capital ($)
Max position cap %
Fixed-risk method (1R)
Risk $ = Capital × Risk%. Shares = Risk$ ÷ (Entry − Stop)
Portfolio capital ($)
Max risk per trade %
Entry price ($)
Stop-loss price ($)
Target price ($)
Conviction (1–10)
Conviction tier framework
High (8–10): ½ Kelly, cap 8%. Medium (5–7): ¼ Kelly, cap 5%. Low (1–4): Fixed 2%.
Conviction (1–10)
Capital ($)
Win probability
Win/loss ratio
CA
Cross-Asset Correlation & Macro Regime
Correlation matrix · Regime classifier · Regime-driven allocation framework
PM Skill⬡ GitHub

Understanding what actually diversifies your portfolio — and what is merely uncorrelated on average but highly correlated in drawdowns — is the core risk skill of a portfolio manager. During risk-off events, correlations spike toward 1.0 across equities and collapse for UST and gold.

Strong positive correlation (risk concentration, not diversification) · Negative correlation (genuine diversification benefit) · Data: rolling 3Y historical estimates

Enter current macro indicators to classify the regime and see the historically optimal allocation framework for that regime. This is the systematic macro lens that underlies every allocation decision.

2s10s spread (bp)
US 10Y yield %
VIX
ISM Manufacturing PMI
Core CPI YoY %
Unemployment rate %
IS
Investment Idea Screener
Thesis quality · Non-consensus signal · Catalyst timing · Publishability score
Analyst Skill⬡ GitHub

Before spending 10 hours building a model, stress-test the idea against the questions every PM will ask. The best analysts filter ruthlessly before committing time. This tool forces the six questions that distinguish a publishable idea from wishful thinking.

Ticker
Direction
What is the market missing? (the mispricing in 1–2 sentences)
Primary catalyst and timing
What makes you wrong? (invalidation condition)
Conviction level (1–10)
Is the thesis genuinely non-consensus?
Is the primary catalyst within 6 months?
Is the stock sufficiently liquid to exit quickly?
Upside / downside ratio (estimated)
Does the fundamental model confirm the thesis?
Has this idea been pitched to a critical audience?
Aeon Nimbus Research · Quantitative Finance
Quantitative Finance Models
View on GitHub
Original browser-native implementations of quantitative finance models — Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo simulation, stochastic volatility, and fixed-income analytics. All computations run client-side in JavaScript with no external dependencies.
Aeon Nimbus Research · Original implementations · MIT-compatible · All computations in-browser
Launch →
𝒩
Black-Scholes Pricer
European call & put pricing with full Greeks — Delta, Gamma, Vega, Theta, Rho — via closed-form formula.
OptionsGreeksBlack-Scholes
Launch →
Ω
Monte Carlo Options
Exotic option pricing via simulation — Vanilla, Binary, Barrier, Asian. Payoff distribution chart included.
Monte CarloExoticSimulation
Launch →
GBM Path Simulator
Simulate Geometric Brownian Motion price paths. Custom drift μ, volatility σ, time horizon T and path count.
GBMStochasticCanvas
Launch →
⟨σ⟩
Heston Stochastic Vol
Stochastic variance model. Compare GBM vs Heston paths — see volatility clustering emerge in real time.
HestonVol ClusteringStochastic
Launch →
𝒜
Bachelier (ABM) Model
Arithmetic Brownian Motion option pricing for non-lognormal assets. Compares with Black-Scholes across the strike range.
BachelierABMFixed Income
Black-Scholes Option Pricer
Aeon Nimbus · BlackScholesCall / BlackScholesPut ↗
C = S·N(d₁) − K·e^(−rT)·N(d₂)  |  d₁ = [ln(S/K) + (r + σ²/2)T] / (σ√T)  |  d₂ = d₁ − σ√T
Spot Price S
Strike K
Time T (years)
Risk-free Rate r (%)
Implied Volatility σ (%)
Call Price
per share
Put Price
per share
Intrinsic (C)
max(S−K, 0)
Put-Call Check
C−P = S−PV(K)
Option Greeks
Spot S
Strike K
T (years)
Rate r (%)
Vol σ (%)
Paths N
Option Type
Barrier Level
MC Price
per share
95% CI ±
conf. interval
BS Reference
vanilla benchmark
Paths
simulated
Monte Carlo prices converge as N→∞. Use 10,000+ paths for stable estimates. Binary and barrier options are path-dependent — each step must be simulated individually.
GBM Path Simulator
Aeon Nimbus · GeometricBrownianMotion ↗
dS = μ·S·dt + σ·S·dW  ⟹  S(t) = S₀ · exp[(μ − σ²/2)t + σ√t · Z]  where Z ~ N(0,1)
Initial Price S₀
Drift μ (annual %)
Volatility σ (annual %)
Time Horizon T (years)
Number of Paths
Expected E[S_T]
Simulated Mean
Simulated Std
P(S_T > S₀)
Heston Stochastic Volatility
Aeon Nimbus · StochasticVarianceModel ↗
dS = μS dt + √v·S dW₁  |  dv = κ(θ−v)dt + ξ√v dW₂  |  corr(dW₁, dW₂) = ρ  |  Feller: 2κθ > ξ²
Price S₀
Drift μ (%)
Init. Variance v₀ (%²)
Long-run Var θ (%²)
Mean Reversion κ
Vol of Vol ξ
Correlation ρ
Time T (years)
Heston paths GBM (const. vol)
Heston model produces realistic volatility clustering — paths spread and contract in bursts, unlike constant-vol GBM. Negative ρ creates the leverage effect: falling prices → rising volatility.
Bachelier (ABM) Option Model
Aeon Nimbus · ArithmeticBrownianMotion ↗
dS = μ dt + σ_B dW  (additive)  |  C_Bach = (F−K)·N(d) + σ_B√T·n(d)  |  d = (F−K)/(σ_B√T)
Forward / Spot F
Strike K
Time T (years)
Bachelier Vol σ_B (absolute)
BS Vol σ_BS (%) for comparison
Bachelier Call
Bachelier Put
BS Call (ref)
Delta (Bachelier)
Bachelier (ABM) allows negative prices — suitable for negative interest rates or spread options. For ATM: Bachelier vol ≈ BS vol × S₀. Used in SABR model calibration for rates markets.
All tools are for educational and informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Results are model-based estimates only.
Proprietary Systematic Research

Quantitative Strategies

Twelve proprietary systematic strategies across equity, FX, and commodities — built to trade, not open-sourced. Backtested on 99–100% real tick data across 12+ years of full market cycles. Full methodology available to qualified allocators on request.

Systematic Equity Strategies · 7 Models · Backtested 2006–2026
Strategy Type CAGR Sharpe Max DD Vol Risk
KAIROS Market neutral L/S 13.10% 1.18 15.02% 11.09% Low Reports →
KRONOS Dual-momentum rotation 20.54% 1.00 25.43% 20.57% Moderate Reports →
AEGIS Market timing 14.01% 1.08 15.61% 12.81% Moderate Reports →
BOREAS Trend following 18.17% 1.04 23.55% 17.55% Moderate Reports →
PROTEUS Double layer 16.83% 1.07 18.23% 15.74% Moderate Reports →
TYPHON Market timing + risk 44.79% 1.12 42.10% 39.32% High Reports →
EREBUS Double layer + risk 54.38% 1.14 48.30% 48.40% High Reports →
KAIROS
Market Neutral Long/Short · Low risk
13.10%
CAGR
1.18
Sharpe
15.02%
Max DD
KRONOS
Dual-Momentum Rotation · Moderate risk
20.54%
CAGR
1.00
Sharpe
25.43%
Max DD
AEGIS
Market Timing · Moderate risk
14.01%
CAGR
1.08
Sharpe
15.61%
Max DD
BOREAS
Trend Following · Moderate risk
18.17%
CAGR
1.04
Sharpe
23.55%
Max DD
PROTEUS
Double Layer · Moderate risk
16.83%
CAGR
1.07
Sharpe
18.23%
Max DD
TYPHON
Market Timing + Risk · High risk
44.79%
CAGR
1.12
Sharpe
42.10%
Max DD
EREBUS
Double Layer + Risk · Very High risk
54.38%
CAGR
1.14
Sharpe
48.30%
Max DD

* Annualised figures. Historical backtested performance 2006–2026. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. These are quantitative research models, not investment advice or financial recommendations.

FX & Commodities · Proprietary Systematic · 99–100% Real Tick Data · 2013–2025 · 12,262 Combined Trades
Pair Type Sharpe LR Corr Max DD Win Rate Profit Factor Recovery Trades Tick Quality
USD / JPYTrend Following 2.130.90 15.83%39.6%1.299.68×3,163 99%
XAU / USDMean Reversion 1.820.96 15.54%51.2%1.225.86×2,908 99%
EUR / JPYTrend Following 2.200.90 16.35%48.3%1.205.68×2,174 99%
GBP / USDMean Reversion 2.310.97 23.76%49.4%1.122.67×2,037 99%
EUR / USDTrend Following 1.910.93 34.52%44.6%1.184.63×1,980 100%
USD / JPY
Trend Following
Foreign Exchange · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
2.13
Sharpe
0.90
LR Corr
15.83%
Max DD
39.6%
Win Rate
1.29
Prof. Factor
3,163
Trades
XAU / USD
Mean Reversion
Commodities · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
1.82
Sharpe
0.96
LR Corr
15.54%
Max DD
51.2%
Win Rate
1.22
Prof. Factor
2,908
Trades
EUR / JPY
Trend Following
Foreign Exchange · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
2.20
Sharpe
0.90
LR Corr
16.35%
Max DD
48.3%
Win Rate
1.20
Prof. Factor
2,174
Trades
GBP / USD
Mean Reversion
Foreign Exchange · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
2.31
Sharpe
0.97
LR Corr
23.76%
Max DD
49.4%
Win Rate
1.12
Prof. Factor
2,037
Trades
EUR / USD
Trend Following
Foreign Exchange · 100% Ticks · 2013–2025
1.91
Sharpe
0.93
LR Corr
34.52%
Max DD
44.6%
Win Rate
1.18
Prof. Factor
1,980
Trades

Backtested on 99–100% real tick data (MetaTrader 5) — the highest fidelity available in institutional-grade simulation. Results use proportional position sizing (fixed % risk per trade). 12,262 combined trades across a full 12-year cycle (2013–2025) spanning COVID, the 2022–2023 JPY intervention cycle, and multiple rate regimes. Backtested results do not guarantee future performance. Full methodology and walk-forward analysis available to qualified institutional allocators upon request.

Build Your Ideal Portfolio

Simulate allocations across all 12 proprietary strategies — 7 systematic equity models and 5 FX/commodity systems. Assign weights and compute the blended risk-adjusted profile. Wtd. Sharpe and Max DD span all strategies; Eq. CAGR and Eq. Vol are equity-weighted metrics (scaled to your equity allocation).

Total Allocation 0%

Educational tool only. Simulated results based on historical backtested data. Not investment advice.

Portfolio Metrics
CAGR
Total Return
Sharpe
Sortino
Max DD
Calmar
Volatility
Win Rate
Profit Factor
Best Week
Worst Week
Metrics computed from the blended simulated equity curve. Real portfolio performance will differ due to inter-strategy correlation and sequence risk.
Weekly Quantitative Reports

In-depth quantitative research for each strategy — weekly reports covering the mathematical framework, model developments, portfolio movements, and quantitative reasoning behind each strategy's evolution.

AI Agent Compatible · Structured for Programmatic Consumption

Reports are structured as machine-readable research briefs. Feed them directly into your AI agent pipeline, LLM workflow, or systematic monitoring system. Each report delivers consistent JSON-compatible structured data: signals, model state, portfolio moves, and quantitative rationale — designed for both human reading and agent ingestion.

60 SUBS
KRONOS
Dual-Momentum Rotation
Ray Dalio quantitative market regime detector & Trend Following — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Nasdaq · S&P 500 · Commodities · Bonds
52 SUBS
AEGIS
Market Timing · Macro Protection
Macro strategy and protection — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Sector ETFs · Index Funds · Fixed Income
34 SUBS
KAIROS
Long-Short Momentum
Market neutral long-short momentum — weekly quantitative research report.
US Equities · Large & Mid Cap Stocks
BOREAS
Multi-Factor Equity
Multi-factor equity selection — weekly quantitative research report.
US Equities · Multi-Factor Stock Selection
TYPHON
Market Timing + High Return
Macro strategy and high returns — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Cross-Asset Macro · Equities · Rates · FX
EREBUS
Macro + Volatility Trading
Macro strategy and volatility trading — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Volatility Products · Index Options
PROTEUS
Double Layer Macro + Vol
Macro strategy and volatility trading — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Options on Major Indices & ETFs
⚠ These reports are for informational and educational purposes only. They describe the quantitative methodology, mathematical models, and portfolio evolution of each strategy. They do NOT constitute trading signals, investment advice, or personalized financial recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Proprietary Systematic Research · Independently Developed
Systematic FX & Commodities Strategies
Two proprietary rule-based strategies, backtested across a full 12-year market cycle (2013–2025) on 99% real tick data — the highest fidelity available in institutional-grade simulation. Spanning COVID volatility, the 2022–2023 JPY intervention cycle, and multiple rate regimes. Results presented using proportional position sizing (fixed % risk per trade) — the standard institutional methodology, allowing meaningful comparison across AUM levels. Combined sample: 6,071 trades. No discretionary overlay. Methodology proprietary. Full backtest data available to qualified institutional allocators upon request.
6,071
Combined Trades
> 1.8
Both Sharpe Ratios
≥0.90
Both LR Correlations
99%
Real Tick Quality
Trend Following
USD / JPY
Foreign Exchange · Systematic
2.13
Sharpe Ratio
Exceptional
0.90
LR Correlation
Strong
Max DD (Relative)
15.83%
Recovery Factor
9.68×
Win Rate
39.6%
GHPR / Trade
+0.20%
Profit Factor
1.29
Total Trades
3,163
Equity Curve · 2013–2025
Trend-following with 1% proportional risk sizing — scalable and AUM-agnostic. The low win rate is structural in momentum strategies: edge comes from asymmetric payoffs, not frequency. Statistically robust sample. Stress-tested through COVID volatility (2020) and the 2022–2023 JPY intervention cycle.
Proprietary · Compounded
Mean Reversion
XAU / USD
Commodities · Systematic
1.82
Sharpe Ratio
Excellent
0.96
LR Correlation
Exceptional
Max DD (Relative)
15.54%
Recovery Factor
5.86×
Win Rate
51.2%
GHPR / Trade
+0.05%
Profit Factor
1.22
Total Trades
2,908
Equity Curve · 2013–2025
Smoothest equity curve of the two strategies — near-linear compounding confirmed by LR Correlation. Max drawdown less than half that of the USD/JPY strategy, despite identical position sizing. Symmetric win rate profile typical of a mean-reversion edge. Tested across gold's secular bull (2018–2025) and two Fed tightening cycles.
Proprietary · 99% Real Ticks
Backtested on 99% real tick data (MetaTrader 5), the highest fidelity available in institutional-grade simulation. Results use proportional position sizing (fixed % risk per trade), directly comparable to standard fund performance metrics. Backtested results do not guarantee future performance. Strategies are not offered for public investment. Full methodology, walk-forward analysis, and monthly P&L breakdown available to qualified institutional allocators upon request. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. These are quantitative research models only. Not investment advice.
Portfolio & Products

Fund Lab

Three vehicles for research, capital allocation and quantitative tooling.

Research Lab is the research and product layer of Aeon Nimbus — housing a live paper portfolio, systematic equity strategies, and the portfolio construction toolkit. Each vehicle is built on the same quantitative framework: regime-aware, disciplined, and fully transparent.

Coming Soon
Exchange-Traded Products

ETPs tracking our systematic strategies are in development. Stay tuned — subscribe to Research for updates.

Model Portfolio · Multi-Asset
Asset Allocation
Dynamic Fund
A macro-driven paper portfolio rebalancing dynamically across seven asset classes. Equity, fixed income, gold, EM and commodities with regime-aware sizing.
+28.4%Since Inception
1.31Sharpe Ratio
−8.2%Max Drawdown
View Fund →
Systematic · Equity & FX
Systematic
Strategies
A library of 12 proprietary quantitative strategies spanning momentum, mean-reversion and macro regimes across US equities and global FX pairs.
12Active Strategies
2Asset Classes
Explore Strategies →
Interactive · Analyst Toolkit
Open Source
Tools
Live analyst toolkit — DCF models, options pricing, Monte Carlo, factor analytics and more. Every tool a PM or research desk expects fluency in, open to all.
12+Live Models
Open Toolkit →
Work With Me

Services & Consulting

Four ways to work together — research access, quantitative model development, strategy sessions, and financial tooling. Nothing here constitutes investment advice.

↓ Q2 2026 Investor Letter (PDF) Free sample of research format & methodology
RESEARCH ACCESS
EQUITY & MACRO RESEARCH
For investors, analysts, and PMs
Every formal investment call — entry, stop-loss, position size, and full thesis — published before the outcome is known. Macro briefs, central bank reads, and geopolitical market analysis. Currently free on Substack. Premium structured delivery available for institutional teams requiring formatted reports or direct distribution.
  • ✓ Pre-outcome calls with full thesis
  • ✓ Macro briefs & central bank analysis
  • ✓ Permanent auditable track record
  • ✓ Open model portfolio · 12 strategies
Educational & informational — not investment advice.
Subscribe Free →
QUANT CONSULTING
SYSTEMATIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
For funds, prop desks & fintech teams
Fixed-scope engagements covering systematic strategy design, factor model construction, backtesting frameworks, and financial data pipelines. Delivered from the same quantitative process behind the 12 strategies published on this site — regime-aware, walk-forward validated, and production-ready.
  • ✓ Strategy design & backtesting
  • ✓ Factor model construction · Python
  • ✓ Data pipeline & signal engineering
  • ✓ Fixed deliverables agreed up front
Software & methodology consulting — not investment advice.
CONSULTATION
STRATEGY CONSULTATION CALL
For PMs, analysts & quant developers
90-minute focused session on systematic strategy development, portfolio construction methodology, or macro research process. Structured around your specific problem — strategy validation, factor selection, position sizing, or research framework design. One-off, no retainer required.
  • ✓ 90-min one-on-one session
  • ✓ Systematic strategy & backtesting
  • ✓ Portfolio construction & risk
  • ✓ Written summary delivered after
Educational — not personalised investment advice.
AI & AUTOMATION
FINANCIAL TOOLING & AI BUILD
For finance teams & fintech products
Design and build of AI-driven research tooling, data automation, and financial dashboards — the same stack behind this site. Scoped as fixed-deliverable projects: define the problem, agree the output, ship. Particularly suited to investment firms wanting to automate research workflows or build internal quantitative tools.
  • ✓ AI research automation
  • ✓ Financial dashboard & data pipeline
  • ✓ Quantitative tooling & screeners
  • ✓ Fixed scope, fixed deliverables
Software & workflow consulting — not investment advice.
Current Availability
Open to project enquiries and consultation bookings. Background spans long/short equity (Madrid), quant research (Crandon AM), macro strategy (Santomera Bay Capital), Big Four M&A advisory (PwC), and venture (Antler · SpinLab). Based in London — remote-first for consulting engagements.
Get In Touch

Let's Talk

Interested in research, quantitative strategies, collaborations, or hiring opportunities? I typically respond within 24–48 hours.

Opens your email client to send
Contact Methods

Use the form for detailed enquiries. For quick professional contact, LinkedIn is the fastest channel.

Availability
Open to research collaborations
Open to institutional enquiries
Considering full-time roles
Selective on advisory roles
Equity
Read on Substack ↗
Ticker
Direction
Entry
Target
Stop
Size
Horizon